Back to Results

Letters to and from Chester University

Categories: Correspondence

The Society wrote to the Vice-Chancellor of Chester University to underscore the research undertaken on Scottish heritage by staff who have been placed “at-risk” of compulsory redundancy.

The Vice-Chancellor, Eunice Simmons, responded the same day with the following:

Dear Dr. Gilmour,

Thank you for your letter on behalf of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.

I am pleased that you have a high opinion of colleagues at Chester and appreciate you reaching out in support of them.

You express concern about actions we are taking in relation to staffing and in response I feel I should draw your attention to the situation as it pertains to Chester. Firstly, as I have written to other correspondents, the quality of the teaching and research in Archaeology and Heritage is not under consideration here. I do however, have to consider this subject in relation to the wider University and the sector.

Secondly, since I arrived at Chester in January 2020 the University has been discussing business planning with its staff and I have sought to make this a transparent and collaborative exercise.

In business planning this year Departments were asked again to consider staffing against the pattern of student recruitment and there is no doubt that Humanities subjects more broadly are challenged in this regard. The Faculty therefore came forward with a proposal to reduce staffing.

Our new University strategy focuses on the citizen student and I fully appreciate the wider import of Humanities and other key areas which can support students in this. I can confirm therefore, that the University has already taken a strategic decision to seek to maintain its Humanities subjects but this does not mean that we do not have to take some action regarding staffing levels. We are doing this in as measured a way as possible and whilst it will lead to a small reduction in staffing it is not an existential threat to any team or Humanities Department.

I feel it would be inappropriate for the University not to undertake this exercise as the potential consequence is being unable to afford to recruit staff to subjects where there is significant growth in numbers. This would result in some colleagues beyond Humanities continuing to be subject to totally unfair staff: student ratios.

The longer-term solution is actually to increase the pool of students wishing to study historical subjects. I have included below the graph that shows how much the pool has diminished – and indeed the increased competition from Russell Group institutions which has definitely impacted Chester. Even given this, we of course understand the realities of a competitive market and that we need to re-group to better compete, including in summer 2021’s recruitment round.

I should also reassure you that there is a comprehensive consultation exercise underway. We are holding detailed discussions with affected staff and will seek to mitigate the impact as far as this is possible. For example, our intention is to be flexible in terms of the timing of any redundancy and to facilitate opportunities for job-sharing, grant applications or redeployment if appropriate.

I hope this institutional and sector context goes some way towards explaining my decision to proceed.
Yours sincerely,

Eunice Simmons

 


Letter to Chester University Vice-Chancellor ▼

Back to Results

Help us to do more

Help us: champion research; stimulate discussion; enhance public understanding; and share our extraordinary heritage. Donate directly to the Society now.